MexiMail
General Category => Classic Stamps 1856 - 1900 => Maximilians => Topic started by: Rodolfo Torres Vazquez on June 08, 2018, 07:58:10 PM
-
Hello friends!.
I am reviewing the collection I bought and I found this. Puebla 108-866, probably Sub-1, Acatzingo?. It coming with comments of the ex-owner saiying that is Sub-19, but is the date in my opinion. Any comments are welcome, thanks in advance!
Regards!Rodolfo
-
Rodolfo,
From my collection 13c 108 866 Sub 1 used Acatzingo.
Regards,
Manuel.
-
Nice stamp, thanks!, but any idea of the number in my stamp? ???
Regards!
Rodolfo
-
I have checked the notes from Mr. Morris saying that is 61 Tecali, above of the "1" of "61" appear another "61"; in the back of the stamp was added with pencil "61, Tecali". (the position of the number "1" is correct). Any comment please!, thanks!
Regards!
Rodolfo
-
Dear Rodolfo,
I had some free time and I did check my Puebla's sub-consignments and I think Mr. Morris mentioned on your Tecali Sub 61 is at error because the numbers are too large.I did check all my Puebla Maximilian sub con-consignments that I have starting with # 1 Atlixco that looks like a capital "I", #4 Matamoros is in manuscript, from # 12 Acatzingo down to #8 of the Engraved Tehuacan ALL have Small Numbers not like your 61 Tecali that is missing from my collection.The cancellation on your stamp is not the one Tecali on Schatzkes.I hope this information will add something to our discussion and I can provide you with scans that you would like to see if I have them.
Best regards,
Manuel.
-
Good point my friend!. I have checked my Subs., of Puebla and all have a Small Numbers too. Finally I will register my stamp as normal without Sub. Thanks for your help Manuel!
Regards!
Rodolfo