Please HelpWith Sub., from Puebla

[Rodolfo Torres Vazquez]

Thanks Manuel!.    The circle is closing and posibilities too: probably 58, Atlixco?

Regards!
Rodolfo

[Manuel Iglesias]

Rodolfo,
Still with no clue.
Thanks for sending the full stamp with cancellation.
Regards,
Manuel.

[Rodolfo Torres Vazquez]

Thanks Jean-Claude!.  In this case it look as 32, but with the "3" very closed, what you think?

Regards!
Rodolfo

[Jean-Claude]

Hello Rodolfo, the sub number cannot be S28 or S29 because the cancellation is with a double circle for Chalchicomula (28) or Tehuacan (29) as you can see on the attached pictures. I also attach samples of S32 (Atlixco) and S38 (Acatlan) with clear numbers and partial single circle cancellation.... Make your choice.... Cheers JC

[Rodolfo Torres Vazquez]

Hi Manuel!

Tha unfortunately the cancellation is ilegible, here is the complete stamp, probably Atlixco for the "o" in the final letter?, thanks for your help!

Regards!
Rodolfo

[Manuel Iglesias]

Rodolfo,
The cancellation may help in your dilemma. Can you show it?.
Manuel.

[Rodolfo Torres Vazquez]

Hello friends!

I will add some topics more because I adquired a big Maximilian Collection.   Here another question:  This stamp is from Puebla, 3-1866, the ex-owner says Sub., 38 Acatlan, but the Sub., looks different, maybe is number 28 or 29?, please any comments are welcome, thanks!

Regards!
Rodolfo